An 11-year-old woman was handcuffed and brought into police custody after authorities traced a prank telephone name to 911 again to her telephone.
Aaliyah Zarate, 11, was arrested by an officer who got here to Crosby Middle School in Texas to take her in after a false hearth alarm name was made by means of her telephone
Video footage taken by her mom, Vanessa Zarate, because the younger woman was arrested confirmed the juvenile in handcuffs about to be taken away in a police car whereas her mom was shouting, “Do you have to take her? This is crazy.”
Ms Zarate’s dad and mom have questioned why their 11-year-old daughter was handled so harshly.
“To this day, we have no information from the school or from Precinct 3, the Constable,” Ms Zarate’s father, Mark Zarate, mentioned to ABC13.
“No type of paperwork as to what she was charged with. It was handled so unprofessionally. Very, very unprofessionally.”
The sixth-grader claims that it was her pal who took her telephone and made the decision with out her realizing, however was nonetheless taken into custody.
“It was a long drive there,” the schoolgirl mentioned to the outlet.
“And it really freaked me out because my parents didn’t know where I was.”
Once she arrived at an area juvenile processing centre, she was photographed and fingerprinted earlier than being launched to her dad and mom.
While her dad and mom felt that their daughter was handled harshly, Captain Kirk Bonsal with the Harris County Precinct 3 Constable’s Office mentioned that as a result of Ms Zarate is older than 10, the deputy constable was following coverage, which meant she needed to be arrested and handcuffed.
Her mom is just not so satisfied.
“She’s a child. She wasn’t a threat to anyone, to the police officers, to anyone at the school, to anyone,” she mentioned to ABC13.
“We’re hoping that we’re able to tell our story and this doesn’t happen to other children, young children.”
The District Attorney’s workplace is now trying into the incident, and it’s nonetheless unclear if any formal prison prices will probably be given to the perpetrator of the telephone name, in accordance with the outlet.
Surveillance footage will probably be assessed, and witnesses to the decision will probably be questioned because the investigation continues.
Source: www.impartial.co.uk