Democratic US Rep Judy Chu was amongst 181 individuals arrested close to the US Supreme Court on 30 June following an abortion rights protest within the wake of a ruling to strike down constitutional protections for abortion.
US Capitol Police reported 181 individuals had been arrested for “crowding, obstructing or incommoding” an intersection close to the courtroom and the US Senate workplace constructing throughout a protest organised by abortion rights advocacy teams.
Congresswoman Chu was the lead creator of the Women’s Health Protection Act, a invoice that handed the US House of Representatives that, if signed into legislation, would codify abortion protections affirmed by Roe v Wade.
“When I first heard Roe was overturned, I immediately thought of who would be most harmed by this decision: a young girl who is a survivor of rape, a woman who cannot afford to travel to another state to access critical care, an expecting mother with an ectopic pregnancy whose life is in danger because she cannot have an abortion,” the congresswoman mentioned in an announcement.
“So, when I think of all these women – and more – the decision to join in a peaceful demonstration to make clear we will not allow the clock to be rolled back on abortion rights was easy,” she added.
The congresswoman urged the US Senate to abolish filibuster guidelines which have allowed Republican senators to impede the invoice’s passage within the higher chamber.
“Lives are at stake and this fight is far from over,” she mentioned.
The protest on 30 June, on the ultimate day of the Supreme Court’s present time period, follows every week of actions in Washington DC and throughout the US, demanding federal protections for abortion rights and condemning the Supreme Court’s conservative-majority ruling to remove a constitutional proper with a call in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Also amongst these arrested on Thursday had been actors Busy Phillips and Alysia Reiner.
Earlier on Thursday, President Joe Biden introduced his assist for altering Senate guidelines to codify abortion protections, as he did for passage of voting rights laws, although the Senate lacks the votes to do both.
“The most important thing to be clear about is, we have to change – I believe we codify Roe v Wade in the law, and the way to do that is to make sure Congress votes to do that,” he informed reporters. “And if the filibuster gets in the way, it’s like voting rights … We provide an exception for this. We require an exception to the filibuster for this action.”
Source: www.unbiased.co.uk