The Nehru-Indira family only emotionally exploited the Muslim masses by keeping the Muslim bogey of being a feudal lord intact. This family definitely continued its rule like this, did not do any good to the Muslims. By instilling fear among the Muslims, this family imprisoned them in the shelters. they cut off from the rest of the public
Image Credit source: TwoCircles
Rahul Gandhi When the yatra entered UP, a senior functionary of the State Congress told me over the phone that Muslims had gathered in large numbers to welcome Rahul Gandhi. From the food pandals to the arrangements for the journey, the same people were doing it. Rahul Gandhi Walk for some time and then sit in your car. When the next destination was about to come, he would get down from the car and start walking again. None of the major opposition parties of the state came in his visit. Even in Jat-dominated areas only Muslim He was seen around them. Although there is nothing wrong in this, that a particular community considers the leader of the opposition as its hero. But if a huge minority of the country completely rejects any party, then it is definitely a matter of concern for that party and the organizations that seek its interest.
That is why the head of Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh (RSS) Mohan Bhagwat is continuously giving such messages that Muslims should not be afraid of the BJP government, this government will fully protect their interests. He repeatedly meets Muslim religious leaders and also assures them. But it is also true that the Muslims of the country keep distance from the BJP. He votes against the BJP for every party which seems capable of defeating the BJP candidate. He neither trusts the BJP nor does Bhagwat’s appeals affect him. He sees that image in Rahul Gandhi as of today, which according to his assessment can defeat the BJP in future. There are two-three reasons behind this, one is that Rahul Gandhi comes from that political family, who always gave priority to the Muslim community in the name of the interests of the minorities. This fact was told by the Antony Committee of the Congress itself, which was formed by the party to review the defeat of the Congress in 2014.
Muslims get out of their feudal ego
Mohan Bhagwat has said that there is no need for Muslims to be afraid, but they should stop dreaming of supremacy. It seems that Mohan Bhagwat has put his hand on the weak nerve of the Muslims. In fact, 700 years of Muslim rule has instilled in the hearts of Muslims that their forefathers have been ruling this country, so they should have an upper hand over power. They are so drowned in their feudal arrogance that they forget that the Irani-Turani, Turk and Mongol Muslims who ruled here are long gone. These are the same people, who were governed in the same way as Hindus. 90 percent of the total Muslim population are Muslims, whose forefathers were the subjects of these rulers and became Muslims to get rid of their tyranny. That’s why now their religion may be Islam, but their traditions, thinking and their problems are the same as the rest of the people.
try to bridge the gap
Muslims are also poor, they are also unemployed and they are also victims of discrimination by the people sitting at the top of their society. So they should also understand things like their Hindu brothers. It is not a tact to stick to religious practices only. He may keep his closeness to Rahul Gandhi, but in politics agreeing, disagreeing is a different issue and hating a party is completely different. Mohan Bhagwat is trying to bridge this gap. Gandhiji understood this.
That’s why he had said that there is a big difference between the British ruler and the Muslim ruler, that the Muslims mixed with the rest of the country’s society, but the British continued to make India the base of their plunder. The British never thought about the interest of the people of the country. Rather, they kept fighting the people of the country sometimes in the name of religion and sometimes in the name of caste. The Muslim rulers did get religious conversions done, but only during the initial war period. But then he stayed here.
Muslim rulers in the country were just named
However, it is also a fact that there must have been Muslim rulers in India, but they remained in control only in Delhi. It is known from this that out of 524 princely states in India at the time of independence, only ten percent of them had Muslim rulers. It is concluded from this that even during the time of Muslim rulers, the internal structure of the country was the same.
That is, the princely states were with the same people, who had them before. Akbar tried his best to bring the entire country under his control, yet he could not bring Mewar under his control. The armies of the Mughals could never reach the far south. Aurangzeb’s forces also could not subdue the North East and the Ahom kings of Assam continued to rule. Tribal kings like Bhil and Santhal were never under Mughals. That’s why the Muslim gang to be the ruler of India was created by the British to create division.
Nehru-Indira family increased the Muslim gang
Funny thing is that the Nehru-Indira family only emotionally exploited the Muslim public by letting this Muslim gland remain intact in their minds. In this way, this family definitely kept its rule intact, did not do any good to the Muslims. By instilling fear among the Muslims, this family imprisoned them in the shelters. He was cut off from the rest of the public. Whenever there was a communal riot, the finger would be raised on their localities. The result would have been that there would have been a mob of violence in their localities. The police used to beat them as well as the furious and frenzied crowd.
There has never been any attempt to bring Muslims into the mainstream. His image became that of a closed society living in sackcloth. Famous Urdu story writer Saadat Hasan Manto has exposed this agony with great impunity in his short story. They did not get employment and the average Muslim was confined to madrassas and mosques. It was said, Muslims keep four wives each, and just keep on giving birth to children.
break the rules yourself
The Muslim himself will have to come out of this image. For this, there is no question of ending any of his religious identity, but he will have to face the evils firmly. Whether it is restrictions like separate code of conduct for them or keeping their women locked in the house and confined only to madrasas. The interesting thing is that their own class leader, he himself never sends his children to madrassas, nor keeps his women in hijab, nor is bound by any special code of conduct. He has to fulfill his political ambitions with the help of the bonded people of his society, so he keeps them as scapegoats.
welcome move
The Muslim has to think that the more he remains isolated from the rest of the Indian society, the more he will be immersed in his false pride and false pride. At the same time, he will continue to make the rest of the society his enemy. He has nothing to fear from the government of any political party. Nor will it be good for him to remain a captive of any one camp. He should think with an open mind and see the world. In such a situation, this appeal of Mohan Bhagwat is welcome.
: Language Inputs